For a few years now, United Nations (UN) peace operations have stood at a crossroads, unable to choose which direction to take: to continue down the path of expensive missions with little peace to keep, but which provide much-needed confidence and security in the world’s most difficult contexts; or to opt for less ambitious and more achievable objectives, which would place more responsibility on other actors (national, regional, parallel forces) to shore up basic security in trying to find a path to peace. In its multidimensional endeavors, peacekeeping has not always had the best reputation outside the UN (particularly since the 1990s), but now it also faces skeptics from within (indeed, a number of observers have said the current secretary- general is not a fan of multidimensional peace operations).
- Countries held the line against malaria cases and deaths in 2021: WHO report
- Iran: UN rights experts condemn protestor’s execution, raise alarm over detained artists
- With ocean in ‘dire straits’, Law of the Sea more relevant than ever
- UN agencies warn again of record hunger next year in West and Central Africa
- UN taps potential for trust-building on shared water resources
- Cholera’s continued spread in Haiti a ‘worrying trend’
- Ukraine’s suffering must not become new normal, declares UN rights chief